3 ms·
We reduce welfare spending when times are hard. Same deal. Not a substantial argument against welfare or UBI.
by robotresearcher 9y ago
We reduce welfare spending when times are hard. Same deal. Not a substantial argument against welfare or UBI.
- jerf 9y agoBwuh? Citation needed; I'm pretty sure it went the other way around in the previous downturn.
- robotresearcher 9y agoSo I guess we didn't run out of money per jerf's scenario, then.
- jerf 9y agoThat's not even remotely a sensible argument, since we didn't have UBI then. You are either not arguing in anything remotely resembling good faith or are not tall enough for this ride. You may have the reply to this unopposed; I'm done here.
- robotresearcher 9y agoUBI is usually proposed as a replacement for welfare, so you’d have one or the other. The potential for running out of money one day did not prevent us from having welfare so it shouldn’t exclude the possibility of UBI. The ad hominem shot is surprising, given the straightforwardness of my position. I don’t understand why you are cross. Ah well.