3 ms·
makes it legally OK for Chocolatey to package it than I think most people here are acknowledging. Chocolately never distributed Fiddler packages. This is just
by dsp1234 9y ago
makes it legally OK for Chocolatey to package it than I think most people here are acknowledging.
Chocolately never distributed Fiddler packages. This is just a basic misunderstanding of how Chocolately works.
- akerl_ 9y agoI feel like this is the first half of a comment. If you believe I misunderstand how Chocolatey works, the interesting bit isn't telling me I'm mistaken, it's correcting my mistake by pointing out that Chocolatey doesn't actually copy and redistribute the package, it provides users with scripting sufficient that their local machine downloads the package from the origin service. But in practice, I'm aware of how Chocolatey works, and figured I could get away with pointing out that the US legal system has previously considered access of remote systems to be a crime even in cases of publicly exposed endpoints without having to do a longwinded explanation of the role of Chocolatey vs the end user running Chocolatey's provided scripts.