3 ms·
1st point: Private companies can already ban hate speech so net neutrality won't change anything. 2nd point: An ISP failed to invest in the infrastructure it n
by cup 9y ago
1st point: Private companies can already ban hate speech so net neutrality won't change anything.
2nd point: An ISP failed to invest in the infrastructure it needed to provide the service it promised but something something net neutrality.
3rd point: Companies should be regulated, but not by the government. They should be sued, by the people.
Honestly.. this kind of drivel is so tiring. Can libertarians please go away, or at least stop using resources and infrastructure that only exists because of public funding and government intervention.
- fleitz 9y agoA lot of it also exists because of capitalism, it's a symbiotic relationship. Capitalism produces more wealth which a government can tax to provide more infrastructure for capitalism to occur which produces more wealth. Although this is one area where the interstate commerce clause seems to genuinely apply it would be interesting to see what would happen with some areas following NN and some areas not and what results... I think the real key here is that gov't regulation is not a good substitute for genuinely competitive markets.