4 ms·
Two minor details I disagree with (in an otherwise very interesting and entertaining article): > In the 1980s and 1990s home computers didn't use much electric
by microtherion 9y ago
Two minor details I disagree with (in an otherwise very interesting and entertaining article):
> In the 1980s and 1990s home computers didn't use much electricity. No-one cared about "thermal design power"
In fact, Apple DID have a notorious prior brush with thermal issues: https://www.tekrevue.com/apple-iii-drop/ https://www.tekrevue.com/apple-iii-drop/
> When Apple abandoned the PowerPC they temporarily took a step back into a predominantly 32-bit world with the Core Duo, only fully embracing 64 bits a few years later, with the Core 2 Duo and OS X 10.7.
As far as hardware is concerned, Macs with 32 bit Intel processors only shipped from January (iMac) to November (MacBook) 2006. I did wonder at the time whether gaining a few months was worth saddling software with i386 slices for several years (system frameworks had to be built for 4 different architectures, for instance). It's true that full 64 bit software support took a bit longer to emerge, but that may have been due to the need to support the 32 bit Intel Macs that were shipped.
- justincormack 9y agoThere hasn't been much 64 bit PPC shipped at that point, so not sure many things shipped all 4. But it was weird.
- phire 9y agoThe main cause of the Apple III's thermal issues was Job's instance that computers should be quiet with no fan and no vents. And even then, those requirements should have been possible to meet, if only the Apple III hadn't been rushed to market without enough time for engineers to diagnose and fix these issues.