5 ms·
What interpretation? Your disagreement seems to be with the Geneva Convention itself.
by russell_h 16y ago
What interpretation? Your disagreement seems to be with the Geneva Convention itself.
- mcantelon 16y agoWhen a law allows certain activity based on "suspicion" it means reality-based suspicion, not suspicion based on an individuals hunches or psychic prowess.
- ErrantX 16y agoGiven the wider context of the video it seems the suspicion could have been legitimate in good faith Anyway; the point of this aside was that legally the deaths could have been, well, legal. But they were certainly morally/ethically problematic. Which is the point about whistleblowers; they don;t necessarily just air illegal acts but morally wrong ones as well. This is probably not the thread to get back into the whole debate of "were those deaths illegal" :)