4 ms·
Is this true? I was under the impression that the excess energy is due to the different bond energies of the input and output molecules and not due to mass to
by gwright 9y ago
Is this true? I was under the impression that the excess energy is due to the different bond energies of the input and output molecules and not due to mass to energy conversion.
- colechristensen 9y agoThe mass that's converted to energy in both chemical and nuclear reactions comes from differences in bond energies. Nuclear chemistry is about the bonds between subatomic particles, ordinary chemistry is about the bonds between atoms. Mass-energy conversion isn't a special thing, it's universal. All energy has mass. When energy moves, mass moves, always.
- andrewla 9y agoI'm reasonably certain that this is not correct; this was a viewpoint held fairly briefly in the post-Einsteinian physics community, but abandoned because of a lack of evidence. For the purposes of general relativity, stress-energy is the mass/energy hybrid quantity, but the equivalence is not literal in the sense that in a given inertial reference frame momentum does not attach to energy, but only to mass.