3 ms·

You're making an unsupported assertion that people pay for leftist writing rather than for quality writing. Please supply arguments to support that.

• Chris2048 9y ago
  Assuming "quality" means accuracy/truthfulness, how can the average reader rate the quality of any writing?
  • Arnt 9y ago
    That's a strange question. Do you perhaps mean: as opposed by judging by proxies like nuance, complicated sentences, absence of sensationalism, etc? Hindsight is one way. A reader looking for quality publications can wait a month, reconsider and form a conclusion.
    • Chris2048 9y ago
      Yes. But what conclusion can time bring? What independent conclusion can be better formed at a later date?
      • Arnt 9y ago
        (This feels weird.) Newspapers often print news. Things not yet confirmed or denied elsewhere. Today I see a headline about which ministers knew about a particular evil deed before it was too late. Right now the article rests on anonymous sources, in a week all of of the relevant people will have spoken on the record. The fairness of a summary or clarity of an interpretation is similarly easier to judge after the people involved have had the opportunity to react to the article.