> Despite that, The New Yorker doesn't seem to have lessened at all in the rate of influential and newsworthy pieces it produces (Rowan Farrow's expose of Harve

> Despite that, The New Yorker doesn't seem to have lessened at all in the rate of influential and newsworthy pieces it produces (Rowan Farrow's expose of Harvey Weinstein being one of the more recent notables [1]). OT - they hinted at this in 2002: https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2002/12/16/beauty-and-the-beast-2 https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2002/12/16/beauty-and-the...