3 ms·
This "finger wagging" is chronic in any article related to some kind of environmental change made by people. There's really no disaster here. Far more nuclear b
by averagewall 9y ago
This "finger wagging" is chronic in any article related to some kind of environmental change made by people. There's really no disaster here. Far more nuclear bombs were exploded in California. Far more rocks and soil were disturbed for construction, land reclamation, mining, canal digging, farming, etc. all over the world. There's nothing sacred about the ground which says we should feel sad or shameful about modifying it. I would say blowing up some islands just to see what would happen is fantastic for both fun and science.
People displaced? Being displaced isn't, on its own, a tragedy. I'm sure those islanders didn't become some stateless, homeless street urchins. They probably did just fine in their new home. I will probably never be able to live in my childhood neighborhood because I've been priced out of the property market. That's a common story, but so what? I have no complaints at all about it and wouldn't want to suppress other people's economic activity just so I can feel familiar about my surroundings.
- 7952 9y agoIf people experience it as a tragedy then it is a tragedy. Just because something isn't bad in some situations does not mean that it is ok in all situations.
- averagewall 9y agoIn this case, it turns out the relocation did cause problems. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_testing_at_Bikini_Atoll#Relocation_issues https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_testing_at_Bikini_Atol...