3 ms·
I seriously doubt it’s a deliberate strategy on their part in this case, but Microsoft has been known to pull this type of maneuver in the past: Step one: “We
by zenlikethat 9y ago
I seriously doubt it’s a deliberate strategy on their part in this case, but Microsoft has been known to pull this type of maneuver in the past:
Step one: “We love Kubernetes! Run it on Azure! It’s great”
Step two: “Kubernetes experience on Azure is best enjoyed using Microsoft Enterprise Ingress, Microsoft Custom Resources for Business, and developing in Visual Studio. Use those!”
Step three: “Oh, the CTO wants to migrate workloads to AWS instead? Too bad you used so many of of our custom and proprietary add ons, that’s going to make migrating incredibly expensive. Just stay on Azure and everything will be just fine...”
- tyingq 9y agoPlausible, but not as if AWS doesn't promote it's own proprietary lock in services. K8S does help a bit in this regard, but all three of the cloud big cloud players have reasons, products, policies, and strategies to lock you in.
- zenlikethat 9y agoYup, just explaining how K8s is not a magic salve you can rub on everything to prevent vendor lock-in.