> The decision “could have repercussions in areas that go well beyond sports betting: gun control, immigration, sanctuary cities...” And this is why the SCotUS

> The decision “could have repercussions in areas that go well beyond sports betting: gun control, immigration, sanctuary cities...” And this is why the SCotUS will not make a landmark decision causing a "dam burst." The Justices can certainly limit their decision in many ways, and it'll be interesting reading the opinions that they produce. But I don't think they've been interested in drastic changes for quite some time.