> But I don't have a decent solution to this conundrum. I have. The German model is wrong for the reasons you allured to. If states can't be trusted to be arbi

> But I don't have a decent solution to this conundrum. I have. The German model is wrong for the reasons you allured to. If states can't be trusted to be arbiter of acceptable speech then they shouldn't have that job. > And remember, the German constitution was written at the pleasure of the allies That would be an appeal to authority and we all know US made few mistakes in the past so I'm not sure why you'd want to use that fallacy. > This is largely cultural I'm sure. Must be. Thinking that the state is always right and bossing people that disagree is historically very German.