4 ms·
I am happy to compare IPOPT as well. There was a github issue for this: https://github.com/oxfordcontrol/osqp_benchmarks/issues/1 https://github.com/oxfordcontr
by sidereus 9y ago
I am happy to compare IPOPT as well. There was a github issue for this: https://github.com/oxfordcontrol/osqp_benchmarks/issues/1 https://github.com/oxfordcontrol/osqp_benchmarks/issues/1
As I said there, the current IPOPT Python interfaces do not report the timings. If you are aware of any fair way to time it from Python, I would be happy to add it. In my opinion using the Python "time" module can cause lags due to the Python interpreter.
- wenc 9y agoIf you can write your models in AMPL or GAMS or some modeling language, you would be able to test IPOPT's raw speed. I used IPOPT from AMPL for years and it is a formidable solver for general large-sparse NLPs. It would be nice to see benchmarks against it.