4 ms·
I'm not sure why everyone is poo-poo-ing this. I think this is going to be a good first attempt at this kind of feature. With a few changes and refinement it co
by knodi 9y ago
I'm not sure why everyone is poo-poo-ing this. I think this is going to be a good first attempt at this kind of feature. With a few changes and refinement it could help users steer clear of bad service providers.
- giancarlostoro 9y agoOr be more aware that their "common" password routine is not a good policy to maintain.
- ygjb 9y agoI think that everyone is poo-poo-ing this because it means there would be lasting consequences for prioritizing permissionless innovation over solid engineering practices coupled with defense in depth. Given the audience for this site, it's not surprising that there would be consternation over this kind of feature.
- zaarn 9y ago>because it means there would be lasting consequences for prioritizing permissionless innovation over solid engineering practices coupled with defense in depth. Awful, just awful! How could anyone make money with software if I had to engineer it properly? Why do such cruel people exist who force me to do this? Truly only a villain would. To be more serious, I hope that developments like this will finally hammer the point home for the "quick'n'dirty" developer crowd, especially node.js ecosystems seems to be prone to this.