Original downvotes possibly because your source is your interpretation of information collected from laypeople who were about to take money for silence. That's

Original downvotes possibly because your source is your interpretation of information collected from laypeople who were about to take money for silence. That's not strong evidence. Further downvotes likely because your tone is defensive and you throw around wild accusations. In other words, you presented weak evidence then violated community norms in responding. However, I would love to check out your site, to see if there's useful information regarding this thread on it. Can you share a URL?