3 ms·

http://www.cnn.com/2017/11/06/politics/donald-trump-koi-pond-japan/index.html http://www.cnn.com/2017/11/06/politics/donald-trump-koi-pond... https://gizmodo.c

http://www.cnn.com/2017/11/06/politics/donald-trump-koi-pond-japan/index.html http://www.cnn.com/2017/11/06/politics/donald-trump-koi-pond... https://gizmodo.com/that-viral-photo-of-president-trump-dumping-fish-food-i-1820175438 https://gizmodo.com/that-viral-photo-of-president-trump-dump... an honest question, do your content police block CNN for this one article? if yes, i respect your consistency but i think CNN deserves some forgiveness. if no, why not? what is the threshold? any threshold is just A SECOND slippery slope. > The first is an attempt to mislead people about events that have happened i see. and who gets to decide what has happened? CNN or FOX? Google or Mozilla? i think... show me a group capable of political objectivity, invulnerable to influence, and i can start to come around.

astura 9y ago
You're either extremely misinformed or are being intentionally disingenuous. https://www.buzzfeed.com/craigsilverman/how-macedonia-became-a-global-hub-for-pro-trump-misinfo https://www.buzzfeed.com/craigsilverman/how-macedonia-became... Are you also against spam filters, virus scanners, security certificate warnings, mixed content warnings, and known malware domain click-throughs?
hanklazard 9y ago
> an honest question, do your content police block CNN for this one article? Which content police did I propose? I simply pointed out that you're conflating political fiction (eg George Orwell's 1984) with fake news (eg this story from "American News dot com": https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/tech-news/facebook-google-crack-down-fake-news-advertising-n684101 https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/tech-news/facebook-google-crack...). > http://www.cnn.com/2017/11/06/politics/donald-trump-koi-pond-japan/index.html http://www.cnn.com/2017/11/06/politics/donald-trump-koi-pond... Was this video you posted from CNN fake? Was someone fabricating that or did it really happen? It's a very dumb story (and one of the reasons I don't bother with CNN), but I don't get the sense that it was fabricated. Yes, news sources have political slants, I doubt you'll find anyone to argue with you on that one. The clickbaitization of news continues to ruin journalism, and I'd really like to reverse the trend. However, that's a different issue than the problem I pointed out with your argument.

astura 9y ago

You're either extremely misinformed or are being intentionally disingenuous. https://www.buzzfeed.com/craigsilverman/how-macedonia-became-a-global-hub-for-pro-trump-misinfo https://www.buzzfeed.com/craigsilverman/how-macedonia-became... Are you also against spam filters, virus scanners, security certificate warnings, mixed content warnings, and known malware domain click-throughs?

hanklazard 9y ago

> an honest question, do your content police block CNN for this one article? Which content police did I propose? I simply pointed out that you're conflating political fiction (eg George Orwell's 1984) with fake news (eg this story from "American News dot com": https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/tech-news/facebook-google-crack-down-fake-news-advertising-n684101 https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/tech-news/facebook-google-crack...). > http://www.cnn.com/2017/11/06/politics/donald-trump-koi-pond-japan/index.html http://www.cnn.com/2017/11/06/politics/donald-trump-koi-pond... Was this video you posted from CNN fake? Was someone fabricating that or did it really happen? It's a very dumb story (and one of the reasons I don't bother with CNN), but I don't get the sense that it was fabricated. Yes, news sources have political slants, I doubt you'll find anyone to argue with you on that one. The clickbaitization of news continues to ruin journalism, and I'd really like to reverse the trend. However, that's a different issue than the problem I pointed out with your argument.