The article says this: > … the commission said it didn’t really care about the public’s opinion on net neutrality unless it was phrased in unique legal terms.

The article says this: > … the commission said it didn’t really care about the public’s opinion on net neutrality unless it was phrased in unique legal terms. So the article title is incorrect. The point is that submissions to regulatory consolations have to be relevant. Repeating the same argument does not make that argument more relevant.