4 ms·
"The only way to manage this is true transparency and no anonymity. In a world of asynchronous threats, it is too dangerous for there not to be some way to iden
by c1sc0 16y ago
"The only way to manage this is true transparency and no anonymity. In a world of asynchronous threats, it is too dangerous for there not to be some way to identify you. We need a [verified] name service for people. Governments will demand it."
I'm torn between thinking "wow, that's scary" & appreciating how much potential for good there is in a completely transparent world. I've been thinking about (genomic & medical) identity: research could benefit massively from a world of total transparency.
23andme is sitting on a growing collection of personal genomics data which they are trying to use for research purposes through their 23andwe program. That's great, but that is still a massive collection of data locked up in a single company.
Imagine a world where every single individual is sequenced at birth & his data is made publicly available for research purposes. Total transparency. Kind of the polar opposite of the current situation where the patient owns his data & permission needs to be gathered to use of that data for research purposes.
We're forgoing massive progress for fear of an artifact of current society (a.k.a. insurance companies).
- weavejester 16y agoThe problem with utopian ideals is that they are often open to abuse by immoral individuals. We should be careful we don't make ourselves more vulnerable in our quest for efficiency. However, I doubt that it's fear of insurance companies (by which I assume you mean medical insurance) that is holding back society from totally transparent world. The EU has stricter privacy laws than the US, but also has universal healthcare.
- cageface 16y agoIn a world of asynchronous threats, it is too dangerous for there not to be some way to identify you. What does he mean by "asynchronous" threats? Did he mean to say asymmetrical?