4 ms·
I got a bunch of emails from senators thanking me for contacting them this week... before I had contacted any of them. Who knows what was said in my name.
by dangrossman 9y ago
I got a bunch of emails from senators thanking me for contacting them this week... before I had contacted any of them. Who knows what was said in my name.
- make3 9y agoThanks
- dang 9y agoWould you please stop posting unsubstantive comments to Hacker News?
- erentz 9y agoI got some too. In my case they were from battleforthenet.com. Maybe yours were too? I had signed up quite some time ago, so I was surprised to see these. I guess they only recently sent them or the senators only recently responded.
- xahrepap 9y agoSame. Came just last week for me.
- benjaminjackman 9y agorobots thanking robots
- pessimizer 9y agoweb 2.0 -> web 3.0
- avs733 9y agoI would report that to them, report that to the Sergeant at Arms for the US Congress (because hey...that seems like a CFAA violation using their computer system), and your state attorney general. Being angry accomplishes nothing, being noisy accomplishes a little. being FUCKING ANNOYING and ever present accomplishes marginally but meaningfully more.
- cirgue 9y ago> being noisy accomplishes a little And a bunch of people being noisy accomplishes a surprising amount, if you can be noisy in the right channels.
- pdkl95 9y agoAlso, it's almost always important to be persistently noisy. A single noise event (or even a handful) can be - and often is - ignored. Silence is insidious because even after a very noisy scandal, silence eventually normalizes the status quo. The only way to counter this - and be seen as a real issue that needs to be addressed - is to be noisy in the right channels every time the problem happens, with the noise continuing until the problem is actually fixed. Protesting, letter writing, and political action in general is not a one time event. It's a force that needs to be continuously applied.
- avs733 9y agoThis is a much more articulate version of what I posted and should be taken very seriously. The reason citizen movements so often lose out is because they are able to gather momentum for a one time event, but they are fighting against group with paid staff (not a slight just a reality) who do this full time. They are there on the same message every day. I have worked with several activist groups that can't get the 'on message' part down and can't figure out how to apply it consistently and clearly. The same ideas about vision->strategy->tactics applies the same to activism as it does to a startup. It's the different between the grand canyon and a really big rainstorm.
- cirgue 9y ago> letter writing Especially this: letters get way more notice than phone calls or online petitions. Many representatives actually read their letters. Phone calls typically get filtered through staff, and they generally don't communicate a whole lot to the rep unless the person calling is a significant player in their district. If you write a clear, concise letter explaining how an issue impacts you, your peers, and local/regional business, you will have a pretty solid shot at getting someone's attention.
- deleted 9y ago[deleted]
- mc32 9y agoNot sure of these people's analytics and or agenda if any, but apparently lots of comments were automated and or duplicates: http://www.emprata.com/reports/fcc-restoring-internet-freedom-docket/ http://www.emprata.com/reports/fcc-restoring-internet-freedo... I'd be interested in other people's opinions on their conclusions.