How about a man and a chicken? If you tell me a chicken can't give meaningful consent and therefore a man can't force a chicken into marriage, then what right d

How about a man and a chicken? If you tell me a chicken can't give meaningful consent and therefore a man can't force a chicken into marriage, then what right do we have to eat them? Seriously, I'm not joking. It is a valid point when arguing against gay marriage to point to the "slippery slope" of bestiality. But it is also a valid point to state that there's really no good reason to make marrying a chicken illegal. Fundamentally, I believe most opposition to gay marriage is based upon disgust. And I'm confident the same is true for marrying a chicken. Disgust is hardly an adequate justification.