3 ms·
The overhead of layer 2/3 packet headers in OpenVPN did not cause such a huge slowdown, its much more likely that OpenVPN was operating in TCP mode, and thus su
by throwaway2048 9y ago
The overhead of layer 2/3 packet headers in OpenVPN did not cause such a huge slowdown, its much more likely that OpenVPN was operating in TCP mode, and thus subject to the tcp-in-tcp[1] problem with tunnel internal tcp sessions. Even an extraordinarily slow machine by modern standards can manage 100mbit openVPN without much of an issue.
EDIT: did not see UDP results. There is still something else going on here, thats still much too slow for openVPN (without tweaking).
[1] http://sites.inka.de/bigred/devel/tcp-tcp.html http://sites.inka.de/bigred/devel/tcp-tcp.html
- sitharus 9y agoReading TFA both TCP and UDP OpenVPN modes were tested. UDP was about three times faster than TCP, but SSH was three times faster than that. Possibly the SSH encryption could have been more optimal for their use case?