3 ms·
He doesn't say his parents were poor or blue-collar workers, he compares himself to a child of aristocrat. Context is everything. > He was a child of aristocra
by egor598 9y ago
He doesn't say his parents were poor or blue-collar workers, he compares himself to a child of aristocrat.
Context is everything.
> He was a child of aristocrats; I am the child of modest workers.
When a one-digit millionaire compares himself to a billionaire like Bill Gates, using "modest" to describe
one's wealth would be appropriate in this context.
- garmaine 9y agoChild of “modest workers” in a communist country can have different meaning. Maybe they’re party elites? We don’t know. Something just doesn’t add up though.
- omginternets 9y agoHe's using the word "modest" to mean "not particularly prestigious" as opposed to "poor".
- 1wd 9y agoIn another article he writes: "In China, where I was born, there are a lot of people who work much harder but could not enjoy similar results. The difference is that I was lucky enough to have had the chance to move abroad at a young age, thanks my parents. In other words, as Warren Buffett said, a large part of life is the lottery at birth." http://www.economist.com/whichmba/mba-diary-standing-oration http://www.economist.com/whichmba/mba-diary-standing-oration