7 ms·
> No amount of visa restrictions in the US is going to change those variables. Hence the growing disdain for globalization, particularly in the parts of the co
by TheAdamAndChe 9y ago
> No amount of visa restrictions in the US is going to change those variables.
Hence the growing disdain for globalization, particularly in the parts of the country that _haven't_ been growing economically. Americans' wages have been stagnant or growing lower than inflation for decades. When that has been occurring, it doesn't make sense for workers to be pro-immigration or pro-globalization, because that would increase labor competition.
If we compete against developers in other countries that have subsidized education, free healthcare, and a lower standard of living, how is that fair to American workers?
Should we _lower_ American standards to compete with them, even though corporate profits are through the roof? Personally, I don't think so. At some point, quality of life needs to be prioritized over return on investment.
Before you say "but it increases the quality of life of that foreigner," we don't live in a global government. I feel that our economy should be controllable by our government, and our government has no control over the economy or laws of another country.
- addicted 9y agoYeah. Clearly the way to improve this situation is to get rid of the immigrants and reduce taxes on the corporations and the richest. Clearly.
- TheAdamAndChe 9y agoI said nothing about taxes. Also, sarcasm does nothing to advance the conversation. If you see logical flaws in my thinking, please teach me. However, snide comments do nothing but reinforce preexisting thought processes.