11 ms·
I don't like to complain about the grammar or formatting of things posted on HN, because usually people here should be clever enough to figure out how to read
by toomanybeersies 9y ago
I don't like to complain about the grammar or formatting of things posted on HN, because usually people here should be
clever enough to figure out how to read it.
But this article was really hard to read. The author needs to do a better job of enclosing examples in quotes, it's hard to parse what's article, and what's example quotes.
> Thus speak often does the work of say, tell and ask, as in I speak him why?
I cannot parse that sentence easily, because I struggle to understand what's an example and what's not.
> Thus "speak" often does the work of "say", "tell" and "ask", as in "I speak him why?"
Now that, I can understand reasonably easily, just by adding quotes. Even better:
> Thus "speak" often does the work of "say", "tell", and "ask". For example: "I speak him why?"
Change a couple of words and add some more grammar, and it's crystal clear what the author is trying to convey.
- ramy_d 9y agovery much agreed. I had to re-read several times this sentence at the very begining: > To commonly stands in for other prepositions such as at, in or on:
- golemotron 9y agoI noticed the same. It was funny given the topic of the article.
- lolc 9y agoPart if its charm is the mixing of grammars. I rather liked it the way it was. Even if I had to re-read some sentences.
- cooper12 9y agohttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Use%E2%80%93mention_distinction https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Use%E2%80%93mention_distinctio...