4 ms·

If you're interested in roll-your-own things like this, stop by #mcdevs on Freenode and take a look at our documentation at http://wiki.vg http://wiki.vg, where

by TkTech 9y ago

If you're interested in roll-your-own things like this, stop by #mcdevs on Freenode and take a look at our documentation at http://wiki.vg http://wiki.vg, where we've been RE'ing the protocol and game internals for 8+ years.

oxguy3 9y ago
Ah, good ole wiki.vg is still around; good to see! Haven't been in the Minecraft modding scene in years, but that site was always a godsend (I once worked on a project to implement a chat-only Minecraft client for Android; couldn't have even attempted it without wiki.vg). And wow, I can't believe Minecraft is 8 years old -- feels like I first played it just yesterday.
mentos 9y ago
Are Minecraft servers with a massive number of players something common or really not something the average player cares to participate in? I used to run my own Ultima Online server with an emulator called RunUO about 15 years ago. The same sort of fun I had running that server is what I see people enjoying in Minecraft today. Its really great to see. It was possible back then with a .Net windows server to support 1000+ concurrent clients with very little noticeable lag. I'm currently working on my own game in Unreal Engine 4 but if I could clone myself I think I would set about creating a Minecraft client that could connect to a RunUO server so that you could achieve those kind of 'MMO' numbers. As well, you could leverage the RunUO codebase to add support for a lot of the Ultima Online functionality (home ownership, spell casting, deep crafting, etc, etc) What is the best community to look into for supporting massive numbers of concurrent players in Minecraft?
- SpaceManiac 9y ago
  If you're interested in doing anything with Minecraft where starting from the official client/server won't cut it, #mcdevs is the right place. I have no idea about what the players want these days. The large-player-count servers I believe still use instancing and transferring players between servers to support those numbers. The other hard part is the game's mechanics. You'd need a lot of careful game design to reign in the destructible nature of the game world and all its contents. Minecraft isn't about questing and loot, it's about construction, and if you're not leveraging this you might be better served by making your own game. Large servers typically address this with round-based deathmatch or deathmatch-like gameplay, not really what you seem to be interested in.
shoghicp 9y ago
We still use it sometimes at Mojang :)

by TkTech 9y ago

oxguy3 9y ago

Ah, good ole wiki.vg is still around; good to see! Haven't been in the Minecraft modding scene in years, but that site was always a godsend (I once worked on a project to implement a chat-only Minecraft client for Android; couldn't have even attempted it without wiki.vg). And wow, I can't believe Minecraft is 8 years old -- feels like I first played it just yesterday.

mentos 9y ago

Are Minecraft servers with a massive number of players something common or really not something the average player cares to participate in? I used to run my own Ultima Online server with an emulator called RunUO about 15 years ago. The same sort of fun I had running that server is what I see people enjoying in Minecraft today. Its really great to see. It was possible back then with a .Net windows server to support 1000+ concurrent clients with very little noticeable lag. I'm currently working on my own game in Unreal Engine 4 but if I could clone myself I think I would set about creating a Minecraft client that could connect to a RunUO server so that you could achieve those kind of 'MMO' numbers. As well, you could leverage the RunUO codebase to add support for a lot of the Ultima Online functionality (home ownership, spell casting, deep crafting, etc, etc) What is the best community to look into for supporting massive numbers of concurrent players in Minecraft?

SpaceManiac 9y ago
If you're interested in doing anything with Minecraft where starting from the official client/server won't cut it, #mcdevs is the right place. I have no idea about what the players want these days. The large-player-count servers I believe still use instancing and transferring players between servers to support those numbers. The other hard part is the game's mechanics. You'd need a lot of careful game design to reign in the destructible nature of the game world and all its contents. Minecraft isn't about questing and loot, it's about construction, and if you're not leveraging this you might be better served by making your own game. Large servers typically address this with round-based deathmatch or deathmatch-like gameplay, not really what you seem to be interested in.

shoghicp 9y ago

We still use it sometimes at Mojang :)