3 ms·
Yes he is. The information he released in the latest round of "secrets" gave away informants to people that can (and will) kill them. The story I've heard is t
by gloob 16y ago
Yes he is. The information he released in the latest round of "secrets" gave away informants to people that can (and will) kill them.
The story I've heard is that Wikileaks attempted to contact the White House, so the two parties could go through the documents and remove references to informants. The White House declined the offer. Has any evidence emerged to suggest this is untrue?
Wikileaks failed to remove actual names. I don't see a difference.
See above.
- rick888 16y ago"The story I've heard is that Wikileaks attempted to contact the White House, so the two parties could go through the documents and remove references to informants. The White House declined the offer. Has any evidence emerged to suggest this is untrue?" Right, so like little children that aren't responsible, they released all of the names instead. "See above." see above
- gloob 16y agoIf the American government is indifferent to the fate of the informants (which refusing to work on removing the names of informants would suggest), then why should Wikileaks be held to a higher standard? At the very least, Wikileaks doesn't have any guns or military and is directly responsible for no deaths whatsoever, a fact which is rather less true of both the Taliban and the Americans.
- deleted 16y ago[deleted]