I'm amazed at your lack of knowledge on a subject you insist on repeatedly commenting about. Net Neutrality has existed longer than you pretend, nearly 15 year

I'm amazed at your lack of knowledge on a subject you insist on repeatedly commenting about. Net Neutrality has existed longer than you pretend, nearly 15 years in various forms that have gotten stronger over time. We have past examples of the bad behavior being stopped by net neutrality you are trying to pretend may or may not happen in the future. The "Market" solution was already tried, and bad actors/bad behaviors already drove the "solution" of net neutrality. You're pretending the past doesn't exist and you're claiming we haven't tried and watched the market solution fail to protect consumers. As for other comments, no China doesn't have Net Neutrality. Without NN, ISP's were deregulated preventing the FTC/FCC from being able to regulate them specifically as you've claimed. What consumers want with NN doesn't immediately fall under "anti-competitive" (look at cable for example), so no the FTC/FCC cannot use anti-competitive regulations to provide the same consumer protections as NN. You repeatedly confuse censorship with "pay to access" or "pay to perform". NN isn't to prevent censorship, its to prevent pay for access/speeds and turning the web into a tiered/package platform like cable is.