Commentary is really scary for his lack of understanding of the actual law that could be applied to this (whether or not you agree with what was done, there's a

Commentary is really scary for his lack of understanding of the actual law that could be applied to this (whether or not you agree with what was done, there's a difference between that and what's legal/what's not). For a great breakdown of whether or not its legal, see http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2010/07/26/pentagon-papers-ii-on-wikileaks-and-the-first-amendment/ http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2010/07/26/pentagon-papers-ii-on-wi...