3 ms·
So to be clear : In the US the government (or its representatives) can damage your property, and then isn't paying for those damages without hassle for the owne
by jcvhaarst 9y ago
So to be clear :
In the US the government (or its representatives) can damage your property, and then isn't paying for those damages without hassle for the owner ?
Besides that :
Why does the police need to use this amount of force to apprehend someone with a gun ?
Couldn't they just isolate the guy, and cordon off the area so he can't harm others and then just wait ?
Unless there are hostages involved, or immediate danger to the public, it seems a more appropriate way is to de-escalate rather then escalate.
- gonational 9y agoThe US military commonly calls in airstrikes that drop bombs that cost more than houses from aircraft that cost more than entire city blocks, just to kill a single person with a rifle on the side of a hill.