> contains all and only the information I want to see http://noisydecentgraphics.typepad.com/design/images/2008/03/11/yourproduct.jpg http://noisydecentgraphic

> contains all and only the information I want to see http://noisydecentgraphics.typepad.com/design/images/2008/03/11/yourproduct.jpg http://noisydecentgraphics.typepad.com/design/images/2008/03... > examples of better presentations Here it is - http://github.com/ http://github.com/ > Is that information not useful? Sure, all information useful, but presentation and usability of fossil ui is near zero. It looks like a programmer without any aesthetic taste just throw all information in random places on screen just to fill it. While UX designers polishes every checkbox, padding and font size. For example - why unreadable commit ids occupy so much space on the screen? When I open timeline - I want to read commit descriptions first, and only after that I may be interested in some commit id. I'm opening github timeline and I'm focused on commit descriptions, but fossil timeline accents me on useless commit ids! > I'm not trolling here Me too. I bet 99% of Github success is a good UX - but it is very difficult for programmer to understand it.