3 ms·
> I was just addressing an issue somebody else raised earlier about the blurring of news and opinion, by pointing out that the author directly contributes to th
by chickenfries 9y ago
> I was just addressing an issue somebody else raised earlier about the blurring of news and opinion, by pointing out that the author directly contributes to this problem by the way he wrote his article.
I guess I just really strongly disagree that the sentence you quoted constitutes "blurring the line." It says that some people think something and then went on to detail who these people were. Further more, David Brooks is possibly one of the most well known columnists for one of the most well read newspapers in the world. It's labeled "Opinion" and "Op-ed Columnist" at the top. It has an editorialized title, "How Evil is Tech?" It's so clearly NOT news. Nitpicking this one sentence to say that somehow David Brooks is masquerading as news is absurd.
- mindcrime 9y agoNitpicking this one sentence to say that somehow David Brooks is masquerading as news is absurd. That was just one example. If anyone is nitpicking here, I'd argue it's you. And I still have no idea what point you're trying to make.
- chickenfries 9y agoThe point I'm trying to make is that this op-ed doesn't "blur the line" it's a textbook, completely average op-ed and correctly labeled as op-ed.