4 ms·

I have not heard about it. Could you give me a link and information on those lies please?

• nlperguiy 9y ago
  Article below has more than 50 references that describe the argument well. http://anthonycolpo.com/sweet-stupidity-part-2-the-bitter-truth-about-robert-lustigs-anti-sugar-claims/ http://anthonycolpo.com/sweet-stupidity-part-2-the-bitter-tr... You can check the sources yourself too. Although, I believe Lustig changed the narrative and is currently promoting diets rich in starch (which means high volume - low calories) and most of his studies produce a caloric deficit (while he denies it despite the fact that less calories are metabolized due to digestion of starch). I believe he also likes referencing fructose extract consumption studies that have no direct mapping to a real diet. For example, consumping 100g of fructose through fruit won't do you any harm.