3 ms·
They did not move to any platform. You ask the question as if being associated with a platform is a basic necessity!
by osrec 9y ago
They did not move to any platform. You ask the question as if being associated with a platform is a basic necessity!
- kinkrtyavimoodh 9y agoWell, unless they are purely communicating in person or by phone, SMS, or email (or snail mail) they ARE on some platform.
- osrec 9y agoYes, if you're being pedantic about it, but they did not go from one Facebook-like platform to another. I think people just don't see much value in Facebook-esque platforms like before, because they recognise them as places filled with all sorts of irrelevant junk that can usurp copious amounts of valuable time.
- kinkrtyavimoodh 9y agoThat's true but to an extent that a social networking platform derives most of its utility from having people present on it, it being a non-FB-like platform may only be a matter of time. It could become more FB-like (if that was deemed necessary) or it could be bought by FB or FB-like companies.
- r00fus 9y agoiMessage/Photostream? Privacy concerns lead my family to use nothing else.