3 ms·
The question was not whether or not an employer should continue to pay a person. The question was whether or not some angry internet person should be responsib
by castis 9y ago
The question was not whether or not an employer should continue to pay a person.
The question was whether or not some angry internet person should be responsible for the livelihood of a developer of a product they are having difficulty with.
- toss1 9y agoOh, so it'd be ok if the "angry internet person" hust happened to be the PM's boss, noticed this abomination & fired them? Indeed, if more "angry internet people" (with good clear points like this one) actually provoked performance reviews, we might have better software. Quit the sophistry. The guy had a real point and you're merely trying to make distracting noise.
- castis 9y agoYour skewed view of my words led you to a strange end point. Ill quit the sophistry when you stick to arguments that make sense.