I simply haven't found many bugs in (mostly auto-generated) getters/setters during the past 25 years, but it's purely anecdata of course. >While I don't know o

I simply haven't found many bugs in (mostly auto-generated) getters/setters during the past 25 years, but it's purely anecdata of course. >While I don't know of any hard evidence, it passes my internal plausibility test that if some of the "2 screen" functions become "1 screen" function, bugs might be less likely. Yes, mine too, but only for randomly chosen pieces of code. What I don't believe is that the linear correlation between SLOC and bugs that studies have found in large codebases allows us to pick and choose the lines of code that are easy to eliminate and expect the number of bugs to drop proportionately.