3 ms·
Because that would not be "internet" access, it would be Facebook access. If it were marketed as such, I can see your point. But it should not be labeled "int
by ensignavenger 9y ago
Because that would not be "internet" access, it would be Facebook access. If it were marketed as such, I can see your point. But it should not be labeled "internet" access, and should not receive the subsidies that the FCC provides for Internet access.