3 ms·
Because accepting a job at a firm immediately after shifting government rules in its favour is corruption. Its absurd to claim that the government work was impa
by nindalf 9y ago
Because accepting a job at a firm immediately after shifting government rules in its favour is corruption. Its absurd to claim that the government work was impartial when so many regulators end up taking advantage of the revolving door between government and industry.
- ghrifter 9y agoOk, so you lose your job due to your commission expiring, or you get replaced by a new administration. but you cant be a lobbyist so what do you work for? other goverment jobs, or back to the private sector. what if we had a google exec become some internet government position, then went back to google? would there be this public outcry?
- aeontech 9y agoOf course there would be a public outcry if during his government appointment he worked to weaken or dismiss regulation that impacts Google directly. It’s the textbook definition of conflict of interest.
- rhino369 9y agoIt's only corruption if there is some sort of quid pro quo. If I were telecom lawyer, I'd rather Title II to be honest. Creates more work.