I did no such thing, nor have I made any comment about baggage or exemption from history. The exact opposite: I pointed out that Dems need to be better at real

I did no such thing, nor have I made any comment about baggage or exemption from history. The exact opposite: I pointed out that Dems need to be better at realizing that no one is pure and accepting less than perfect candidates... Robert E Lee is a part of a confederate heritage fondly opined about by significant numbers of Republicans. That heritage has more than a little "Kill the Yankee" sentiment to it, right? That's a pretty objective fact, hence the double standard in the opposition research against Bernie, hence its use as an example. To your secondary point: the verifiable fact that said heritage has been overtly reshaped into a modern fantasy by racists and racist organizations, its correlation to Jim Crow, its disingenuous hand-waiving about slavery, and its tight ties to the [Republican Southern Strategy](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Southern_strategy https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Southern_strategy) kinda sorta do mean that supporting, aggrandizing, or selectively portraying it beyond the limits of its historical boundaries is pretty darned supportive of racism. I think describing the common fellating of this anti-history from otherwise anti-minority, anti-immigration, anti-democracy, fundamentalists as 'waxing poetic with a glint in their eye' is putting is kindly and mildy. Right wingers showing fondness for the Confederacy is hardly a secret... I mean, who signed all those bills and built all those statues?