> All anyone in this thread is trying to figure out is why folks getting paid poorly to do work that we know costs tons of money (because we see the bills) woul

> All anyone in this thread is trying to figure out is why folks getting paid poorly to do work that we know costs tons of money (because we see the bills) would incur net negative profit. Because hospitals have to pay: - residents' salaries - attendings' salaries - health insurance - residents' insurance (for practicing) - licensing fees - taxes It turns out, that all comes out to a lot of money. And hiring additional residents doesn't really save them much money, or bring in much additional revenue. The costs are greater than the revenue or savings. So, it's not profitable. > to do work that we know costs tons of money (because we see the bills) That's a question of medical billing, which is a whole other separate topic. In short: hospitals don't receive anywhere near the sticker amount for those bills, and a massive chunk of reimbursements from privately-insured patients goes towards recouping the losses that Medicare and Medicaid patients incur (as explained elsewhere, hospitals lose money on a per-patient basis for publicly-insured patients).