> The number of bugs are proportional to the lines of code, this is undeniable from empirical data. Including unit tests? A code base with unit test is likely

> The number of bugs are proportional to the lines of code, this is undeniable from empirical data. Including unit tests? A code base with unit test is likely to contain less bugs and more lines of code. And what about code golf?. This just does not seem right and I believe the original saying is related to languages with/without rich stdlibs and/or the NIH syndrome.