3 ms·
That's a very fair point. The argument is not that Palo Alto should be making Foursquare. It's more that with all of our iThings and Droids, we're at a place wh
by davidbalbert 16y ago
That's a very fair point. The argument is not that Palo Alto should be making Foursquare. It's more that with all of our iThings and Droids, we're at a place where these local/mobile apps are starting to matter more and it seems the most obvious place for these to spring up is in large cities. This is not a reason New York is fundamentally better as much as it seems that New York might be better for the times.
I have no doubt that these types of apps will be used all over the country in towns big and small. It's just easier to get critical mass in the cities.
- kscaldef 16y ago> It's just easier to get critical mass in the cities. That's absolutely true. I have some personal experience trying to get critical mass around a local-social application, and I've seen a number of others, and it's very hard in most places. What isn't clear to me is how starting such a service in New York teaches you anything useful about achieving critical mass anywhere else.