3 ms·
It wouldn't. But I'd wager that Uber isn't going to be held accountable (or not very accountable) for this, so why not write the rules so that everyone gets to
by alexanderstears 9y ago
It wouldn't. But I'd wager that Uber isn't going to be held accountable (or not very accountable) for this, so why not write the rules so that everyone gets to be as cavalier? It'd save a lot of companies the headaches that go along with I.T security.
- panarky 9y agoSome drivers don't stop at stop signs. Let's remove the stop signs so all drivers can be as cavalier. It'd save a lot of drivers the headaches that go along with traffic laws.
- alexanderstears 9y agoI don't dispute your logic though I would prefer more traffic law enforcement. But the uber situation would be closer to this - the parking meter costs $20/hr and a parking ticket costs $5. We're creating a situation where people who break the law get ahead of those who obey it. Either we can ramp up enforcement (good luck with that happening) or we can level the playing field.
- ehnto 9y agoI would prefer smarter drivers over more laws. Mandatory defensive driver education programs and stricter tests. Few people ever intend to break the laws that get them into accidents, so making sure they don't accidentally break them by being, smarter, more aware drivers would ideal.
- Spivak 9y agoBetter example. Almost everyone performs rolling stops at stop signs. Even when people are ticketed they just pay it don't change their behavior. Why have the fine at all?
- colejohnson66 9y agoBecause it’s basically free money for the departments the ticket money goes to