I did follow the news about being remotely vulnerable. That's why I said I'd understand the urge to remove the networking stacks. Other vulnerabilities would re

I did follow the news about being remotely vulnerable. That's why I said I'd understand the urge to remove the networking stacks. Other vulnerabilities would require local access. > Why wouldn't you be interested in turning it off? I'm not asking why you'd be interested in it, I'm asking why you'd freak out so much about it given X/Y/Z are already true and you can't do anything about them. There's a bit more nuance in my argument than you're giving me credit for here. > And why would you classify people who'd rather not be running remotely vulnerable code they can't control as "privacy folks"? I already excluded the part about remote vulnerability. See first point above.