3 ms·
No, no, no! This is not the problem with net neutrality. This is some generic argument for the regulation of monopolies, and as such, it is fine. But net neutr
by matt4077 9y ago
No, no, no! This is not the problem with net neutrality. This is some generic argument for the regulation of monopolies, and as such, it is fine.
But net neutrality is devious beyond the abuse of a local monopoly. It doesn't matter if there are ten ISPs available to any given consumer.
The problem is that creates a new monopoly: that of access to an ISPs subscriber. See my aunt-comment (to this) for the full argument.
- Delmania 9y agoThey can do both with NN gone. Force the consumers to pay for different packages and lanes, and then force the services to pay for access to the subscribers.