4 ms·
>how it's useful to have some corporate speech rights for purposes of advertising, but political speech isn't necessary or useful, and may even be self-contradi
by rhino369 9y ago
>how it's useful to have some corporate speech rights for purposes of advertising, but political speech isn't necessary or useful, and may even be self-contradictory.
Most mass media speech is corporate. Banning corporate speech would mean shutting down every for-profit news paper and tv station in the country.
Is the Washington Post putting out a story any different than Amazon putting out a story?
- ubernostrum 9y agoYou seem to think it's impossible to craft a ruling that allows, say, a newspaper to exist at all without also having exactly the current system we have. It's not impossible.