3 ms·
I looked at 4k monitors but ultimately decided against it because as soon as you start scaling then you lose the extra screen real estate. At 4k 150% scaling y
by nickjj 9y ago
I looked at 4k monitors but ultimately decided against it because as soon as you start scaling then you lose the extra screen real estate.
At 4k 150% scaling you end up with the same screen space as 2560x1440.
- pault 9y agoI personally like the higher resolution that scaling provides, but if you don't mind low DPI you should check out the 42.5" 4k panel that Dell makes[0]. I have one in my home office, and while it's not great for design and photo editing, the sheer real-estate available is mind blowing. [0] http://www.dell.com/en-us/work/shop/dell-43-ultra-hd-4k-multi-client-monitor-p4317q/apd/210-ahsq/monitors-monitor-accessories http://www.dell.com/en-us/work/shop/dell-43-ultra-hd-4k-mult...
- markbnj 9y agoI agree and I _almost_ didn't buy the 4k panel, but as I noted in my comment above my first Dell panel lasted 12 years, and that's a long time.