3 ms·
If your use case is so simple that essentially any browser meets your needs, why do you find it strange that others might have different needs? I never underst
by super_mario 9y ago
If your use case is so simple that essentially any browser meets your needs, why do you find it strange that others might have different needs?
I never understood why people have such a hard time with choice. And why saying something no longer meets your needs evokes such reactions.
- pjmlp 9y agoBecause safety. Mozilla and others are just making the Web browsers safer. It was necessary the Internet and explosion of security exploits to realize that although plugins in-process are easier to implement, the older out-of-process architecture was safer and harder to exploit.
- wtallis 9y ago> Because safety. Mozilla and others are just making the Web browsers safer. And yet they broke things like NoScript, which provided security/privacy features missing from plain Firefox and unavailable on any other browser no matter what extensions you installed. If safety was really such a high priority, they would have waited until after a full-featured NoScript WebExtension was possible to implement before deliberately breaking XUL extensions.