> There are plenty of other sites through out the Bay Area where we appropriate transit orient development can and should occur. I think you have to name names

> There are plenty of other sites through out the Bay Area where we appropriate transit orient development can and should occur. I think you have to name names when making claims like this. I'm open to the suggestion that we should "build somewhere else", but it's pretty disingenuous to say that without specifics. It seems to me everywhere in the bay is pretty closed to new housing development, and every city is pointing fingers at every city saying "why don't you build there instead"? Where exactly can we put all these new buildings? Personally I think the answer is "everywhere". Every single neighborhood should accept some level of increased density.