3 ms·
This is so obvious I thought it was satire. The assertion the title makes, "SHOWING GENDER ROLES AREN’T PROGRESSING", is also laughable. It's the equivalent in
by tabeth 9y ago
This is so obvious I thought it was satire.
The assertion the title makes, "SHOWING GENDER ROLES AREN’T PROGRESSING", is also laughable. It's the equivalent in ridiculousness as saying that because men admire beautiful intelligent women, it must mean gender roles are't progressing.
Why wouldn't you want an attractive, muscular man who has money?
- artursapek 9y agoSeriously. Progressing towards what, exactly?
- PKop 9y agoWouldn't it behoove those who can't compete along the defined axes of desirabilty to try to change the rules of the game, or somehow confuse people into attaching social or moral value in pretending common sense and instinct is wrong?
- AnimalMuppet 9y agoSure. It would be intellectually dishonest for them to claim that the rules "should" be different, though (instead of just that they "want" the rules to be different).
- PKop 9y agoCompletely agree.
- gnarbarian 9y agoTowards a world where frumpy androgynous sociologists are the pinnacle of attractiveness. next up: why are women with penises considered unattractive to straight men? [1] https://i.redd.it/mkhwlu2wrs5z.jpg https://i.redd.it/mkhwlu2wrs5z.jpg
- hkmurakami 9y agoAll roads lead to Japan (wrt androgeny at least)
- glauque 9y agoIt's probably going to take a lot more than 10 years of self-delusion to overcome thousands of years of evolution.