3 ms·
I don't think kcorbitt meant that at all. I read it as that if the Bay Area wants to remain (regain?) competitiveness with other, lower-cost areas, it must ada
by techsupporter 9y ago
I don't think kcorbitt meant that at all. I read it as that if the Bay Area wants to remain (regain?) competitiveness with other, lower-cost areas, it must adapt, not that the Bay Area is entitled to hoard every startup. Other areas are competing on the basis of cost or livability so the Bay Area has to navigate that competitive landscape if the people there wish it to remain a destination.
- Finnucane 9y agoWhy do they need to be competitive? Is it a zero-sum game? Will people suddenly decide they don't want to live there any more? The only way the Bay Area/Silicon Valley is going to suffer from this is if the entire tech industry collapses.